Ramayan character
So this means Vasishtha was the great grandfather of Vyasa. Vayu Devĥ) Vasishtha’s son Shakthi: had a son called Parasara and Parasara’s son was Veda Vyasa, who wrote the Mahabharata. Narad MuniĤ) Vayu Dev: Vayu is father of both Hanuman and Bheema. In Mahabharata he was one of the Rishis attended to Krishna’s peace talks in Hastinapur. Maharishi Durvasaģ) Narad Muni: Comes in many occasions in both stories. Durvasha gave a mantra to Kunti, the mother of eldest 3 Pandavas for getting children.
And that is the entire story of Symanthaka Mani, where Krishna goes in search of it, meets Jambavan, and they have a duel, before Jambavan finally recognizes the truth.Ģ) Maharishi Durvasa: who predicted the separation of Rama and Sita was the son of Maharishi Atri and Anasuya, visited the Pandavas in exile. Jambavan being of slow understanding, wished for a duel with Lord Ram, which he granted, saying that it would be done in his next avatar. Apparently, during Ramayan, Lord Ram, was pleased with Jambavanth’s devotion and told him to ask for a boon. The king of bears in Ramayan, who plays a major role, during the building of the bridge, appears in the Mahabharat, technically speaking the Bhagavatam I would say.
Here it the list of 12 such characters who appears in both Ramayana and Mahabharata.ġ) Jambavanth: who was in Rama’s army wants to fight with Rama in Tretha yuga, fought with Krishna and asked Krishna to marry his daughter Jambhavathi. Hence, other characters from the Ramayana should keep their caste certificates ready now,” the Sena concluded.There are many characters who appears both in Ramayana and mahabharata. “Despite the BJP facing defeats in the recent elections, this debate over the caste of Hanuman is likely to continue. He is the embodiment of devotion and loyalty towards Lord Ram…If anyone is trying to write a new Ramayana in UP Assembly by attaching different caste labels to him, then these attempts should be thwarted,” it said. “Hanuman is an important character in the Ramayana. Had this been done by Muslims or ‘progressive’ people, then this Hindutva brigade would have created an uproar,” the editorial said. But those who call themselves guardians of Hindutva are still mum over this. “In a way, they are making fun of Hanuman. A temple of Lord Ram is planned to be constructed in Ayodhya, but these people are trying to find the caste of the devotee of Ram… This way, a new Ramayana is being penned in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly and caste labels are being attached to all its leading characters. The Uddhav Thackeray-led party said that Adityanath’s cabinet colleague Laxmi Narayan Chaudhary said on record in the Assembly that the God was a Jat.Īcharya Nirbhay Sagar Maharaj claimed that according to Jain scriptures, Lord Hanuman was a Jain, the Shiv Sena said. “Thereafter, his party colleague and MLC Bukkal Nawab said he was a Muslim…Actually, trying to find the caste of Lord Hanuman is foolishness,” it said. Thereafter, many others came forward to claim that the ‘Monkey God’ belonged to their caste. “While campaigning in the recently-concluded assembly elections, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had said Hanuman was a Dalit.